Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Mines

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2002No. 71387-1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

— After finding Kenneth Mines guilty of two parole violations, the Indeterminate Sentencing Review Board (Board) revoked his parole. In order to appeal his parole revocation, Mines’ attorney sought a copy of the hearing tape. However, she was informed that the tape was blank. A request for a new hearing was denied and this personal restraint petition (PRP) followed. The Court of Appeals denied Mines’ PRP, holding that though the Board violated RCW 9.95.124 and WAC 381-70-410 by not producing a record of the hearing, Mines had failed to show that he was prejudiced by the absence of a recording.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People Ex Rel. Wallace v. LabrenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Parker v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Personal Restraint of MattsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of MattsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of DutcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of LiptrapCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Born v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API