Legal Opinion
UBS Financial Services, Incorporated v. Carilion Clinic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2013No. 12-2066PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge DIAZ joined.
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question of whether UBS Financial Services, Inc. (“UBS”) and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. (“Citi”) are required, as members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”), to arbitrate disputes arising out of the services they provided to Carilion Corporation in connection with its multi-million dollar bond issues. Carilion claimed that during the course of providing those services, UBS and Citi made numerous…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- UBS Financial Services, Inc. v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. v. BelandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Applied Energetics, Inc. v. NewOak Capital Markets, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Samuel Muriithi v. Shuttle Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. City of RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. Golden Empire Schools Financing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Reading Health System v. Bear Stearns Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Diana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.