Legal Opinion

Lidgate v. Danford

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1916No. 931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Submission Without Action.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

This is a submission upon agreed’facts of a controversy which has arisen under the will of Charles Notley, late of Paauilo, Hawaii, deceased. The provisions necessary to be considered in the determination of the questions raised are included in the sixth paragraph of the will which reads as follows:

“Sixth. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, real, personal or mixed, and wherever situate, I give, devise, and bequeath unto the said Thomas Rain Walker and Anthony Lidgate, in trust nevertheless for the uses and purposes herein set forth, that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bisson v. . W.S.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Graham v. GrahamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hall v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Worley v. TuggleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
  5. Shattuck v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In Re the Trust Estate Created Under Deed of Trust by LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re the Estate of Shunji Kay IkutaHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Peters McLean, Etc. v. Vannattas.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Culver v. ElliottSuperior Court of Delaware · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API