Worley v. Tuggle
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 39 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM WHITLEY CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 1 Met., 359-61; Scales vs. Ashbrook. 1 Story's Equity, sec. 134. 9 B. Mon., 210; Wolfe vs. Bate. 3 B. Mon., 513; Ray 4 Paige, 355; Gates vs. Green.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Williams
JUDGE ROBERTSON dissenting:
It is a well-established and undoubted fact, that when the vendor contracted the land to Jane Early and Henry Tuggle, and agreed to convey it to their children, Marshall Early and John Tuggle, a lien was to be reserved for the unpaid purchase price, and both contracting parties instructed the draftsman to so draw the deed as to secure this lien; and when he had drawn it, he then assured the parties that the language used did secure such lien, it stating the amount of the consideration, “paid and to he paid,” without specifying how much remained unpaid, all fortified…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Enders v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Graves & Barnewall v. Boston Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Wiswall v. HallNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Brown v. LamphearSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
- Thomas v. McCormackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Benson v. MarkoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Russell v. CurranWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
- Castleman-Blakemore Co. v. Pickrell & Craig Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Scott v. SpurrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Cecil v. Kentucky Livestock InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.