Legal Opinion

Bisson v. . W.S.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1894PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the construction of wills, the court must look for something which will exhibit the intention of the testator; either actually, or so suggestively as to permit it to be inferred.

If the instrument is silent as to intention and stands as a mere expression of a will, effect must be given to it according to those rules, which, from long acquiescence, have acquired the force of authority. The present seems to be such a case. We are without any indication as to the intentions of the testator in making this disposition of his realty, other than in the particular clause of the will itself.

Therefore…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferrer v. . PyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Stevenson v. . LesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Collins v. HoxieNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  4. Bassett v. GrangerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Murphy v. HarveyNew York Court of Chancery · 1843

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Baer v. HendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Rudd v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Gilliam v. . Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Salter v. . DrowneNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API