Bisson v. . W.S.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
In the construction of wills, the court must look for something which will exhibit the intention of the testator; either actually, or so suggestively as to permit it to be inferred.
If the instrument is silent as to intention and stands as a mere expression of a will, effect must be given to it according to those rules, which, from long acquiescence, have acquired the force of authority. The present seems to be such a case. We are without any indication as to the intentions of the testator in making this disposition of his realty, other than in the particular clause of the will itself.
Therefore…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ferrer v. . PyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Stevenson v. . LesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Collins v. HoxieNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- Bassett v. GrangerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Murphy v. HarveyNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
3Cited by48 opinions
- Baer v. HendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Rudd v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Gilliam v. . Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Salter v. . DrowneNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.