Legal Opinion

Culver v. Elliott

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided August 5, 1940No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

It is a trite expression that all rules of construction of wills have for their object the ascertainment of the intent of the testator. So fundamental is this object that it constitutes the sole reason for the existence of rules of construction, and no one would have the temerity to advocate a rule which operates otherwise.

The plaintiffs, in order to sustain their position, rely upon three rules, as follows:

1. That the intent of a testator is determined by a reading of the testamentary instrument as a whole and not by the isolated meaning of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conner's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Waring v. Bosher's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Board of Administration v. SteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lidgate v. DanfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Paiko v. BoeynaemsHawaii Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilmington Trust Co. v. PryorCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API