Attorney Grievance Commission v. Proctor
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
McAULIFFE, Judge.
This disciplinary proceeding involves the question of the appropriate sanction to be applied in the case of an attorney found to have been in possession of cocaine and to have possessed marijuana in sufficient quantity to indicate an intent to distribute it.
William Henry Proctor, 41, was admitted to the bar of this State in June 1980, having previously been admitted to the Pennsylvania bar in April 1973. Although he practiced law in Pennsylvania, and has occasionally represented clients within this State, he does not now maintain an office for the practice of law. Rather, he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Braverman v. Bar Assn. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DeutschCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
3Cited by25 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheinbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.