Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Proctor

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 5, 1987No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 5, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

This disciplinary proceeding involves the question of the appropriate sanction to be applied in the case of an attorney found to have been in possession of cocaine and to have possessed marijuana in sufficient quantity to indicate an intent to distribute it.

William Henry Proctor, 41, was admitted to the bar of this State in June 1980, having previously been admitted to the Pennsylvania bar in April 1973. Although he practiced law in Pennsylvania, and has occasionally represented clients within this State, he does not now maintain an office for the practice of law. Rather, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Braverman v. Bar Assn. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DeutschCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheinbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API