Attorney Grievance Commission v. Deutsch
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtRodowsky, J.
Eldridge, J., concurs in the result.
This disciplinary proceeding involves three attorneys who were all of the partners of a former law firm in Baltimore. They did not report their cash fees on the partnership or on their individual tax returns for 1974, 1975 and 1976. Two of the attorneys were convicted, upon guilty pleas, of violating 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (1) as to 1976. The third attorney was given immunity as the key government witness. Under § 7206 (1) any person who "[wjillfully makes and subscribes any return ... which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. PomponioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Gaunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Noble C. BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SweitzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.