Legal Opinion

Watts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 2006No. 27605PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, Judge.

Kennith Joe Watts (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that he was affirmatively misled and misadvised by counsel as to the application of the “eighty-five percent rule” (pursuant to § 559.019.3). 2 Movant claims that counsel’s misadvice rendered his pleas unknowing, unintelligent and involuntary. We reverse and remand for the entry of specific findings of fact and conclusions of law on these allegations and, if necessary, an evi-dentiary hearing.

1) Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. United States v. Carl Anthony ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Trimble v. PracnaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Beal v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Grimes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Nigro v. St. Joseph Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Watts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Myers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API