Legal Opinion

Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Holloman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1911No. 730PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from' 'District Court, Tillman Countyj J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by the Wichita Falls & Northwestern Eailway Company against Ira J. Holloman to condemn land. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

TUENEE, C. J'.

On September 24, 1907, on application of plaintiff in error, the district court of Comanche county appointed commissioners to condemn a right of way for the main line, a “Y,” and an industrial spur over the S. W. % of section 18, township 2 S., range 17 W., of the Indian meridian, adjoining the original town site of Frederick, the property of Ira J. Holloman, defendant in error, pursuant to section 112, art. 9, c. 18, of Wilson’s Stats. 1903 of Oklahoma. Their report was filed with the clerk of the court November 6, 1907, and awarded said defendant $2,954.16. Being dissatisfied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patch v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Brown v. Calumet River Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Empire District Electric Co. v. JohnstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. City of Tulsa v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Erceg v. Fairbanks Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. Department of Transportation v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API