Legal Opinion

Erceg v. Fairbanks Exploration Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1938No. 8107PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit to recover damages for injury to a group of placer mining claims situate in Fairbanks Recording District, Alaska. The trial was had to the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $30,000, plus attorney’s fees and costs.

Both parties have appealed. For convenience they will be referred to as plaintiff arid defendant, as in the court below.

The suit was brought by Mike Erceg as guardian of the estate of George Gartner, an insane person. Erceg was appointed such guardian in August, 1927. Gartner owns three placer…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Hedrick v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Hannan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Schymanski v. ConventzAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API