Legal Opinion
CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 17, 2000No. Civil Action DKC 99-2983PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
On February 10, 2000, the court ordered Defendant De Andre to submit to another deposition on the issue of personal jurisdiction after finding his counsel had “impeded and frustrated the fair examination of De Andre” on that issue during his initial deposition. In addition, pursuant to Rules 30(d)(2) and 37(a)(4), the court or dered De Andre’s counsel to pay the reasonable costs and attorney’s fees associated with retaking De Andre’s deposition and filing the motion to compel his deposition testimony. CoStar has now deposed De Andre pursuant to the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Ottenheimer Publishers, Inc. v. Playmore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Werner-MasudaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Planet Technologies, Inc. v. Planit Technology Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Stewart v. WachowskiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Roberson v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.