Legal Opinion
Coyle v. Palatine Ins. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided June 23, 1920No. 161-3151PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSadler, P. J.
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals will be found in 196 S. W. 560, wherein is given a full statement of the issues and evidence requisite to an understanding and decision of the two fundamental propositions presented in the petition for writ of error. We do not think it necessary to restate the record, except in so far as it may be germane to a clearer understanding of the questions decided. The contract provides that the insurance company “does insure * * * against all direct loss or damage by tornado, windstorm, or cyclone, except as hereinafter provided, * * * ” and provides:
“This…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. HarrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Pelican Insurance v. Troy Co-operative Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Phœnix Insurance v. Boren, Davidson & StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Newark Trust Co. v. Agricultural Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Palatine Ins. Co. v. CoyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3Cited by49 opinions
- Lyons v. MontgomeryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. McKillipTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. BerglundTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- McDonald v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
- Brindley v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.