Legal Opinion

Phœnix Insurance v. Boren, Davidson & Stewart

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1892No. 3336PublishedCited by 38 opinions

The opinion gives a statement.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

This action was brought by appellees to recover upon a fire policy issued to W. E. Jones on a house and stock of goods, which was assigned by Jones to them. The policy contained clauses which made it inapplicable to a loss resulting from fire, if this occurred from invasions, insurrections, civil commotion, foreign enemies, riots, military or usurped power, or by order of the civil authorities; and while the petition alleged that the property was destroyed by fire, it did. not allege that the fire was not occasioned by one of the causes above enumerated. The policy,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beham v. GhioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Pelican Insurance v. Troy Co-operative Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. McElyeaTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Spencer v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. HarrisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Coyle v. Palatine Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  3. International Travelers Ass'n v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. J. H. Mohlman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  5. Cotton v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API