Legal Opinion

Southwick v. Seattle Police Officer John Doe No. 1

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 2008No. 59283-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

¶1 Matthew Southwick appeals the dismissal of his claims against the city of Seattle for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and his claims against King County on summary judgment. He contends that Washington’s claims-filing statute, RCW 4.96.020(4), tolled the statute of limitations for his civil rights claims. He also asserts that the trial court improperly refused to consider an untimely declaration of a previ*295ously undisclosed expert filed in response to the county’s summary judgment motion. We hold that RCW 4.96.020(4) does not toll an action brought under 42 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. West v. ConrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eric Boston v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Keck v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Jeanne Hawkins And Julie Wilson v. Empres Healthcare Mgmt, Llc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Wyant v. CITY OF LYNNWOODDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2008
  5. Southwick v. SEATTLE POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API