Legal Opinion

Bargain City U.S.A., Inc. v. Dilworth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1962No. Appeal, 486PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Cohen,

In this appeal, Bargain City U.S.A., Inc., appellant, attacks the validity of the Act of August 10,1959, P. L. 660, §1, 18 PS §4699.10, which prohibits the Sunday retail sale of certain specified commodities. Although appellant initially attacked the statute upon a variety of grounds under the federal constitution, these issues have been foreclosed by the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Two Guys from Harrison v. McGinley, 366 U. S. 582, 6 L. Ed. 2d 551, 81 S. Ct. 1135 (1961). Appellant now asserts only two bases for the alleged invalidity: (1) that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Seabolt v. Commissioners of Northumberland CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Chartiers Valley Joint Schools v. Allegheny County Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Goodheart v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Goodman v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API