Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1974No. 109PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANDERINO, Justice.

The appellants, Nate Goodman and Voss & Goodman, Inc., filed a complaint in equity seeking to enjoin the en*318forcement of the criminal statute proscribing the Sunday sales of fresh meats, produce and groceries. Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, § 699.15, as amended, 18 P.S. § 4699.-15 (recodified as 18 Pa. S. § 7364). Following a hearing, relief was denied and this appeal followed.

The appellant, Nate Goodman, is the sole owner of all of the stock of the corporate appellant, Voss & Goodman, Inc., which operates a grocery store in Erie, Pennsylvania, under the name of Paul…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Tp. of Moon v. POL. OFFICE. OF TP. OF MOONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Mollan v. LindnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Carroll v. County of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API