Legal Opinion
Hodgson v. School Board, New Kensington-Arnold School District
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 25, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 71-1199PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TEITELBAUM, District Judge.
This action is brought by the United States under the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (“the Act”) (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.). The named defendants are the employer, School Board, New KensingtonArnold School District, and two of its operatives, Theodore Sluser and Wil*394liam L. Irvine. The principal allegation is that the defendant compensates certain of its employees in violation of the Act. The defendant, asserting that it compensates those certain employees in accordance with the terms of a collective bargaining agreement which it has with Service Employees International…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Washington NEAL Et Al., Appellants, v. SYSTEM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD) Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Balter v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Bond v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union, Local 814 v. SalatichDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1970
3Cited by16 opinions
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Jones v. United Gas Improvement Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Jones v. United Gas Improvement CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Harold Weisberg v. U. S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Mamula v. Satralloy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.