Legal Opinion

Davis v. Perry

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1932No. Docket No. 4536PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an action to quiet title to real estate situate in San Diego County. A large number of defendants were brought in, but the real controversy was between plaintiffs and the appellant above named. From a decree in favor of plaintiffs, defendant William H. Perry has appealed.

The complaint is in the usual form, setting up the ownership in fee by plaintiffs and that defendants claim some right, title or interest adverse, wholly without right and a prayer for a decree adjudicating those claims and such other relief as usually follows. Defendant William H. Perry alone…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hoag v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Robinson v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Durbin v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Continental Securities & Investment Co. v. RawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cruz v. Ramírez de ArellanoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  2. McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Palm v. Klapperman (In Re Cady)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. First National Bank v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Holman v. TotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API