Legal Opinion
Green Mountain Insurance v. Foreman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 21, 1994No. 93-076PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Defendant Andre R. Roy appeals the Superior Court’s (O’Neill, J.) ruling that the plaintiff, Green Mountain Insur*441anee Company (Green Mountain), need not defend or indemnify its insured, defendant Vaughn Foreman, under a homeowner’s policy in connection with a tort action Roy brought against Foreman. We affirm, holding that Roy’s negligence count, as set forth in his pleadings, failed to allege facts constituting an “accident.”
The incident giving rise to this dispute occurred at Roy’s home, which he shared with Sandra Murray and rented from Foreman. While Foreman was visiting the couple one…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Johnson Shoes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Providence Mutual Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Jespersen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Fisher v. Fitchburg Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Richard A. Mottolo and Service Pumping & Drain Co., Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- SIG Arms Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Binda v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Panciocco v. Lawyers Title InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Broom v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.