Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Fitchburg Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 13, 1989No. 88-428PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The plaintiffs, David and Julie Fisher, filed a declaratory judgment action against their insurance carrier, Fitchburg Mutual Insurance Company (Fitchburg), asking the court to find that under the terms of the plaintiffs’ homeowner’s policy Fitchburg was obligated to provide a defense against and damage coverage for two suits filed against the plaintiffs by Martin and Barbara Arliss who alleged that the plaintiffs breached an agreement to sell them the plaintiffs’ home. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The Court (Dalianis, J.) denied the plaintiffs’ motion and granted summary judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- First Newton National Bank v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Johnson Shoes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Neuman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Richard A. Mottolo and Service Pumping & Drain Co., Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- High Country Associates v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Providence Mutual Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Aluise v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- EnergyNorth Natural Gas, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.