Legal Opinion
Malone v. United Zinc & Smelting Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 4, 1936No. 26537PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The plaintiff in error and defendant in error will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, respectively.
On April 28, 1934, plaintiff was injured while in the employ of the defendant. The ease was one coming within the exclusive jurisdiction of the State Industrial Commission. Claim was filed with the commission and plaintiff; received compensation until October 20, 1984. At that time the parties filed a joint petition with the commission pursuant to the provisions of section 13391, O. S. 1931, seeking final settlement of plaintiff’s claim.
' After a consideration of the joint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Gray v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Stidham v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Ferguson v. Ferguson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Ingram v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Maryland Casualty Company v. HankinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.