Legal Opinion

American City Bank v. Zetlen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1969No. Civ. 33095PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff bank sued to recover the balance due on a promissory note which provided that in the event of default plaintiff shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees in any action brought to collect thereon. On an order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor and against defendants for $7,469.09, which included interest, costs and attorney’s fees. Defendants appealed from the judgment which was affirmed by this court. (American City Bank v. Zetlen, 253 Cal.App.2d 548 [61 Cal.Rptr. 311].) Thereafter defendants’ petition for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richard v. Degen & Brody, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Coronet Credit Corp. v. West Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Oakland California Towel Co. v. RolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Painter v. Estate of PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Martindell v. BodreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Christensen v. Dewor DevelopmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mandel v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Rumford v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API