Legal Opinion

State v. DeMello

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1986No. DC M337553; CA A32628; SC S32077Published

1Opinion of the Court

716 P.2d 732 (1986)

300 Or. 590

STATE of Oregon, Respondent On Review,

v.

Stephen DeMello, Petitioner On Review.

DC M337553; CA A32628; SC S32077.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 29, 1986.

Decided March 18, 1986.

Craig P. Colby, of Wall & Colby, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

JONES,…

Also in this document: Dissent · Lent; Dissent · Linde.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. StroupOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. BuenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. DeMelloOregon Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API