Legal Opinion
Transmirra Products Corp. And Robert Aronstein v. Fourco Glass Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 14, 1956No. 315, Docket 23836PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal, for want of venue in the court below, of their action for patent infringement brought against a West Virginia corporation. In granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss, Judge Dawson ruled that plaintiffs had shown no acts of infringement committed by the defendant in the Southern District of New York, although he did point out that it maintains a sales office in the district and by the regular and continuous course of activity there may be said to have a regular and established place of business therein. D.C.S.D.N.Y., 133 F.Supp. 531.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. ElbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Telechron, Inc. v. ParissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Pure Oil Co. v. SuarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Penrod Drilling Company v. Sam H. Johnson and James L. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Manchester Modes, Inc. v. Adolph P. SchumanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.