Legal Opinion
Isratex, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 6, 1992No. 91-1699CPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
On cross-motions for summary judgment after argument, this pre-award bid protest action questions whether the Government lawfully can exclude an offeror from participation in a negotiated procurement. The offeror’s product demonstration model failed a mandatory test. The request for proposals, however, did not indicate the relative importance of the characteristics involved, nor did it advise offerors that automatic exclusion would follow from the test failure.
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed. On March 25, 1991, the Department of Defense, Defense Logistics…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Prineville Sawmill Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Bean Stuyvesant, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.