Legal Opinion
New Haven Market Exchange, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 12, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court seeking relief from an assessment of contributions to the unemployment compensation fund made by the defendant as administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act. The court rendered judgment dismissing the appeal and confirming the assessment. The plaintiff has appealed from that judgment.
The facts are not in dispute. Donato and Louis Maisano own and control the Pepe-Maisano Company, Inc., a large wholesaler of food products. Prior to 1930, a number of truck farmers and produce dealers attempted, unsuccessfully, to establish a co-operative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- New Haven Metal & Heating Supply Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Maryland Unemployment Compensation Board v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Murphy v. Doniphan Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Feldman v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- West v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Brittany Farms Health Center, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Hillside Holding Corp. v. Div. of Employment SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. Speed's, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956