Legal Opinion
Fazio v. Brown
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 3, 1988No. 5061PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court which set aside the jury’s verdict for the named minor plaintiff as inadequate and ordered a new trial limited to the issue of damages, after the plaintiff refused to accept an additur. We find no error.
The plaintiffs, Michael Fazio, a minor, and his father, Vincent Fazio, brought suit against the defendants in two counts. In the first count, Michael Fazio sought to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained as a result of a collision between the motorcycle he was operating and an automobile operated by the named defendant.1…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Camp v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fazio v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Tonetti v. BarthConnecticut Superior Court · 2003
- Bowman v. Jack's Auto SalesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Fazio v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Impellizzieri v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance, No. 32 16 40 (Feb. 2, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.