Legal Opinion

Tonetti v. Barth

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 7, 2003No. File No. CV02-0087784SPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrazzini, J.

The present case concerns the novel issue of whether a motorcyclist’s failure to wear high visibility clothing during daylight hours 1 is a proper element of comparative negligence. The complaint alleges that Bruce P. Barth, the defendant, negligently attempted a left turn out of a shopping plaza and struck Michael Tonetti, the plaintiff, who was operating a motorcycle on Route 202 in Litchfield. The collision occured at about 6:24 p.m. on May 5, 2000. The defendant filed a special defense of comparative negligence, one element of which alleges “that the plaintiff was himself negligent . . .…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DW Data, Inc. v. C. Coakley Relocation Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API