Commonwealth v. Mills
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR
Appellant, a criminal defendant, challenges the Superior Court’s decision to overturn a county court’s finding of a violation of the rule-based requirement that he receive a prompt trial.
*324Rule of Criminal Procedure 600 requires that “[tjrial in a court case in which a written complaint is filed against the defendant shall commence within 365 days from the date on which the complaint is filed.” Pa.R.Crim.P. 600(A)(2)(a). Per the' associated computational guidance, periods of delay at any stage of the proceedings caused by the Commonwealth when it has failed to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BradfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. Burno, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In re D.L.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
3Cited by108 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. McCarthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Lear, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.