Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mills

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 2017No. 27 EAP 2016PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR

Appellant, a criminal defendant, challenges the Superior Court’s decision to overturn a county court’s finding of a violation of the rule-based requirement that he receive a prompt trial.

*324Rule of Criminal Procedure 600 requires that “[tjrial in a court case in which a written complaint is filed against the defendant shall commence within 365 days from the date on which the complaint is filed.” Pa.R.Crim.P. 600(A)(2)(a). Per the' associated computational guidance, periods of delay at any stage of the proceedings caused by the Commonwealth when it has failed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BradfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. Burno, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. In re D.L.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. AndrewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. McCarthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Lear, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API