In re D.L.H.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
In this appeal, we consider whether plenary guardians can refuse life-preserving medical treatment on behalf of a person who lacks — and has always lacked — the capacity to make personal healthcare decisions, where the person is neither suffering from an end-stage medical condition nor permanently unconscious.
D.L.H. (“David”), age 53, has suffered from profound mental retardation since birth and has resided at the Ebensburg Center, a Department of Public Welfare (“DPW’) facility, for nearly his entire life. He is an incapacitated person under the guardianship provisions…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rendell v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re FioriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- In the Matter of MoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Program Administration Services, Inc. v. Dauphin County General AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Oliver v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. ZortmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re: Estate of Harold E. RoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.