Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 2012PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We granted review in this case to determine whether the courts below erred in dismissing criminal charges against Defendant-Appellee David Bradford. The trial court discontinued the case because the Commonwealth failed to bring Defendant to trial within the time required by Pennsylvania’s speedy trial rule, Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, when the Magisterial District Judge failed to forward timely the relevant file as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 547(B). Upon review, we determine that dismissal was not appropriate under Rule 600 when the Commonwealth acted with due diligence in relying…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. SELENSKISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. ColeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API