Commonwealth v. Bradford
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice BAER.
We granted review in this case to determine whether the courts below erred in dismissing criminal charges against Defendant-Appellee David Bradford. The trial court discontinued the case because the Commonwealth failed to bring Defendant to trial within the time required by Pennsylvania’s speedy trial rule, Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, when the Magisterial District Judge failed to forward timely the relevant file as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 547(B). Upon review, we determine that dismissal was not appropriate under Rule 600 when the Commonwealth acted with due diligence in relying…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. SELENSKISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ColeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.