Legal Opinion
Marley Cooling Tower Co. v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided August 1, 1991No. 74383PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
The only question we must answer is whether a three judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court was correct in affirming an order of a trial judge awarding workers’ compensation benefits over an argument by petitioners, Marley Cooling Tower Company and its insurance carrier National Union Fire Insurance Company (hereafter collectively Marley), the one year statute of limitation found at 85 O.S.1981, § 43 barred the claim for permanent partial cumulative hearing loss caused by noise exposure at the workplace brought by respondent, Howard Cooper. We hold the three judge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Armco, Inc. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- B.F. Goodrich Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cole v. Silverado Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Ellington v. Horwitz EnterprisesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Vaughan v. City of Broken ArrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Lenders Collection Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.