Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Dupre v. Dupre
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 2005No. C046938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
*1520Opinion
RAYE, J.
In an effort to discourage false accusations of child abuse during custody litigation, the Legislature enacted Family Code section 3027.1.1 Section 3027.1 allows the court to impose monetary sanctions against a witness, party, or party’s attorney who knowingly makes such a false allegation.
Appellant Amy Lynn Dupre (mother) and respondent Rene Roge Dupre (father) shared custody of their nine-year-old daughter J. J. informed her father of inappropriate sexual behavior by the eight-year-old daughter of her mother’s boyfriend, and father contacted his attorney, respondent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- City of Ripon v. SweetinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Shelton v. Rancho Mortgage & Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Borba Farms, Inc. v. AchesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Day v. CollingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ellerbee v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Muller v. Fresno Community Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Sun v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Estate v. Herzog, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.