Legal Opinion

Teitelman v. Dale Petroleum Corp. (In re A & L Oil Co.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 15, 1996No. Bankruptcy No. 95-37612; Adv. No. 96-3087PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

STEPHEN A. STRIPP, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is the court’s decision on a motion by plaintiff Steven Teitelman (hereinafter “trustee”) to compel defendant Alfred Dale, Jr. (hereinafter “Mr. Dale”) to continue with his testimony at a deposition in this adversary proceeding. After the initial day of testimony, Mr. Dale refused to answer most additional questions on the grounds of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The trustee argues on this mo*23tion that Dale waived that privilege by his prior testimony, and seeks to compel the continuation of testimony. This…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krasny v. Gi Nam (In Re Gi Yeong Nam)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Gebhardt v. Saunders (In re Saunders)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  3. Fred AssadiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Leanne Walters v. Richard SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  5. Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Drive Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API