Teitelman v. Dale Petroleum Corp. (In re A & L Oil Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STEPHEN A. STRIPP, Bankruptcy Judge.
This is the court’s decision on a motion by plaintiff Steven Teitelman (hereinafter “trustee”) to compel defendant Alfred Dale, Jr. (hereinafter “Mr. Dale”) to continue with his testimony at a deposition in this adversary proceeding. After the initial day of testimony, Mr. Dale refused to answer most additional questions on the grounds of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The trustee argues on this mo*23tion that Dale waived that privilege by his prior testimony, and seeks to compel the continuation of testimony. This…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krasny v. Gi Nam (In Re Gi Yeong Nam)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Gebhardt v. Saunders (In re Saunders)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Fred AssadiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Leanne Walters v. Richard SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Drive Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022