Legal Opinion
Krasny v. Gi Nam (In Re Gi Yeong Nam)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 11, 2000No. 15-19024PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIANE WEISS SIGMUND, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the PlaintiffiTrustee Marvin Krasny’s Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Requests (“Motion”). The Motion challenges objections made to the discovery requests based on the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. A hearing on the Motion was held On December 7, 1999; no evidence was offered but each party presented argument. For the reasons set forth below, I deny the Motion.
BACKGROUND
Defendants, Gi Nam (“Debtor”) and Yeong Nam (collectively Debtor and Yeong Nam shall be referred to hereinafter as “Defendants”), are…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re: Gi Nam City of Philadelphia v. Gi Nam Marvin Krasny, Chapter 7 Trustee Frederic Baker, Assistant U. S. Trustee, Trustees City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Metz v. Dilley (In Re Dilley)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2006
- Patriot Grp. v. Fustolo (In re Fustolo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- In re McFaddenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- In Re Gi NamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.