Legal Opinion
Runck v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1993No. Civ. 910259PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
Clayton Runck, Jr., appeals from district court orders denying his application for post-conviction relief and motions for reconsideration. The district court rejected, among other contentions, Runck’s assertion that his August 1986 State court convictions for conspiracy to commit arson and for being an accomplice to arson should be set aside because the State violated the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, Chapter 29-34, N.D.C.C. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The parties have stipulated to many of the facts. On November 9, 1984, Runck was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Larry Weaver and Mark Schmanke, United States of America v. Everett Decker, Jerald Jessup and Michael BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane SpringerTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. MoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Alvin Glenn TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.