Legal Opinion

HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 24, 2007No. 34738-5-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — HomeStreet, Inc., sued the Department of Revenue (DOR) for a refund of business and occupation (B&O) taxes it alleged that it had overpaid. This case of first impression requires that we address whether RCW 82.04.4292 allows a lender to deduct, as “amounts derived from interest received,” service fees it earned on qualifying home loans it originated and then sold on the *830secondary market under agreements that required loan servicing.1 If RCW 82.04.4292 allows the deductions for income from qualifying loans HomeStreet services but no longer owns, then it overpaid. We hold that when…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. AOL, LLC v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Aol, LLC v. Washington State Dept.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API