Legal Opinion

HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2009No. 80544-0PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

¶1 — HomeStreet, Inc., is a residential mortgage lender that services loans it sells or securitizes1 to secondary lenders. It received tax deductions for the interest retained from these loans under RCW 82.04.4292 until the Department of Revenue (DOR) issued an order requiring HomeStreet, Inc., to pay business and occupation (B&O) taxes. HomeStreet, Inc., paid the taxes but then sued DOR for a refund. The trial court granted DOR’s motion for summary judgment of dismissal, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. We now reverse the Court of Appeals and order DOR to refund the taxes to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Jackson v. Quality Loan Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. R.B. v. C.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Spokane Cnty. v. Wash. Dep't of Fish & WildlifeWashington Supreme Court · 2018

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API