Legal Opinion

United States v. Baynes

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 5, 1975No. Misc. 74-603, Crim. 74-523PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.

I. Preliminary Statement

On May 15, 1974, acting pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (hereinafter Title III), 1 and in response to the sworn application of David J. McKeon, an attorney with the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the United States Department of Justice, we entered an order authorizing for a period of 20 days the interception of certain wire communications of James Fox, William Jefferson, Ferris Foster, Rus sell Barnes, Herschel Williams and others as yet unknown to and from the…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. VentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  3. United States v. Robert Lee HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Gerald F. Johnson, United States of America v. Thomas Johnson, United States of America v. Edward T. WootenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. VastolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API