Legal Opinion

United States v. Gerald F. Johnson, United States of America v. Thomas Johnson, United States of America v. Edward T. Wooten

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 21, 1982No. 82-1163, 82-1164 and 82-1336PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS.

Separate opinion, concurring in part and dissenting in part, filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:

These three appeals seek the reversal of convictions, based largely on the fruits of electronic surveillance authorized under the District of Columbia Code (“D.C.Code”),1 for violations of the federal Controlled Substances Act.2 Because the appellants present common questions concerning the Government’s compliance with the D.C. Code’s wiretapping provisions, we resolve all three appeals in this opinion. For the reasons…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Robert Stewart v. Donald DongesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Eusebio Escobar-De JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Ojeda RiosSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. John T. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API