Legal Opinion

State v. Mathisen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1984No. Cr. 987 and 995 to 1001PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAND, Justice.

Robert 0. Mathisen appealed from judgments of conviction on eight counts of issuing checks without sufficient funds and from an amended judgment finding him in contempt for failure to comply with the conditions of a prior judgment. After the appeal was taken Mathisen filed a motion to vacate the convictions and dismiss the appeal on the basis that NDCC § 6-08-16, as amended in 1983, was declared unconstitutional by State v. Fischer, 349 N.W.2d 16 (N.D.1984).

The events leading to this appeal cover a lengthy span of time and encompass a host of intertwining judicial hearings and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Crawford v. Board of Ed. of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Fargo v. DawsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API