Legal Opinion

Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1993No. 90D-300490; CA A70518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff asks us to reconsider our opinion, 120 Or App 619, 853 P2d 1323 (1993), affirming a judgment against her on the ground that she did not present sufficient evidence of her damages. She argues for the first time that defendant’s appellate brief misquoted her expert, and that her expert’s testimony, properly quoted, establishes her damages.

The trial court granted a directed verdict for defendant in part on the ground that plaintiff had failed to establish her damages. On appeal, plaintiff failed to show that that ruling was error. Reconsideration is not a forum for making arguments…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Beck v. Fred S. James & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Mears v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Cruz Development, Inc. v. YamalovaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Rogers v. RGIS, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API