Legal Opinion

Cruz Development, Inc. v. Yamalova

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2001No. C97-0626CV; A107105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Plaintiff sold defendant property. When defendant determined that plaintiff had misrepresented facts in connection with the sale, she stopped making payments on the property. Plaintiff brought an action for judicial foreclosure, and defendant counterclaimed for misrepresentation. The trial court entered judgment in plaintiffs favor on the judicial foreclosure claim and in defendant’s favor on her misrepresentation counterclaims. It also awarded plaintiff attorney fees. Defendant appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals. We affirm on appeal and reverse and remand on cross-appeal.

Plaintiff agreed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Tadsen v. Praegitzer Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Pearson v. SchmittOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of Eugene v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Summa Real Estate Group, Inc. v. HorstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Tidrick v. Eagle West Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
  3. Weiner v. Int. Animal Semen Bank, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API