Legal Opinion

Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 2, 1993No. 90D-300490; CA A70518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Frogge petitions for reconsideration of our previous opinion. 116 Or App 570, 841 P2d 703 (1992). We allow the petition and modify our opinion.1

Plaintiffs breach of contract claim for lost profits was dismissed on defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiff assigned error to the order granting that motion. We declined to consider the assignment, citing violations of ORAP 5.45(4). On reconsideration, we exercise our discretion to consider the assignment.

To establish damages based on lost profits, a plaintiff must present evidence establishing the lost net profits. Jenks v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. ReevesOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Jenks v. LarimerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Cruz Development, Inc. v. YamalovaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. J. Lilly, LLC v. Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API