Legal Opinion
SuperGuide Corp. v. DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided July 2, 2002No. CIV. 1:00CV144PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and the motion of Third-Party Defendant Gemstar Development Corporation (Gemstar) for summary judgment against certain Defendants. Although a request for a hearing on these motions has been made, the undersigned finds no hearing is necessary. 1
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In June 2000, SuperGuide Corporation (SuperGuide) brought this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Defendants for infringement of their patents U.S. Patent No. 4,751,578 to Reiter,…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Superguide Corp. v. DirecTV Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Rock Creek Pack Station, Inc. v. BlackwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Superguide Corporation v. Directv Enterprises, Inc., Directv, Inc., Directv Operations, Inc., and Hughes Electronics Corporation, Defendants/third Party and Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Defendant/third Party Plaintiff-Cross and Echostar Communications Corporation, Echostar Satellite Corporation, and Echostar Technologies Corporation, Defendants/third Party v. Gemstar Development Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004