Legal Opinion

Superguide Corporation v. Directv Enterprises, Inc., Directv, Inc., Directv Operations, Inc., and Hughes Electronics Corporation, Defendants/third Party and Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Defendant/third Party Plaintiff-Cross and Echostar Communications Corporation, Echostar Satellite Corporation, and Echostar Technologies Corporation, Defendants/third Party v. Gemstar Development Corporation, Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 12, 2004No. 02-1561Published

1Opinion of the Court

358 F.3d 870

SUPERGUIDE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC., DirecTV, Inc., DirecTV Operations, Inc., and Hughes Electronics Corporation, Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, and

Echostar Communications Corporation, Echostar Satellite Corporation, and Echostar Technologies Corporation, Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Gemstar Development Corporation, Third Party Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-1561.

No. 02-1562.

No. 02-1594.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API