Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Wright
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 6, 2002No. 01 Civ. 2122(GWG)PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Glenn S. Goord; Albert Pao-lano, M.D.; William Smith, M.D.; George B. Duncan; Lester Wright; Carl J. Koe-nigsmann, M.D.; and John E. Cunningham, Jr., M.D. move this Court to dismiss plaintiff James Johnson’s pro se amended complaint. The parties have consented to the disposition of this matter by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTS
A. Background
Johnson filed the original complaint in this matter…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Rodriguez-Garcia v. Municipality of CaguasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Tafari v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- Vega v. ArtusDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.