Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Gainesville Nehi Bottling Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 5, 1960No. B-308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We are confronted with appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal because of the failure of appellant, the original plaintiff below, to comply with Florida Appellate Rule 3.2(f), 31 F.S.A., and Section 59.09, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The rule, which has superseded the statute, provides:

“(f) Payment of Costs by Original Plaintiff. No appeal may be taken by the original plaintiff in any suit or proceeding until he shall have first paid all costs that have accrued in or about the suit, and have been specifically taxed against him, up to the time the appea.1 is taken; provided, that nothing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Callison v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  2. Busch Ex Rel. South Florida Farms Co. v. GoodnoSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Smith v. DillardSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Walker-Skagseth Food Stores, Inc. v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bannister v. HartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Abrams v. GreshamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API