Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Gresham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 1962No. 60-652PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A petition was presented under F.A.R. 3.16(c), 31 F.S.A., to review a judgment for costs. The petitioner had filed an action at law. The case came on for trial before a jury. A verdict was directed for defendants, and plaintiff appealed. As required by F.A.R. 3.2(f), prior to talcing the appeal plaintiff paid a cost judgment which had been entered by the trial court. We reversed the judgment entered on the directed verdict, and remanded the cause for a new trial (Abrams v. Gresham, Fla. App.1961, 131 So.2d 207). The plaintiff-appellant moved in the trial court to have the appellate costs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Abrams v. GreshamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. King v. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Simmons v. Gainesville Nehi Bottling Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Craft v. ClarembeauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Giovannielli v. LacedoniaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API